Get premium membership and access questions with answers, video lessons as well as revision papers.

Explain the meaning of the rule “Nemo dat quod non habet” as stipulated in the Sale of Goods Act.

      

Explain the meaning of the rule “Nemo dat quod non habet” as stipulated in the Sale of
Goods Act.

  

Answers


Raphael
- The common law rule of nemo dat quod non nabet, literally means one cannot give what he
has not.
- It means that a seller of goods cannot give the buyer thereof a better title than he himself
has in the goods.
- This rule was developed by the common law to protect the interests of the true owners of
goods.
- The rule is now embodies in section 23 (1) of the Sale of Goods Act Cap 31, which provide "inter alia"
“….where goods are sold by a person who is not the owner thereof and who does not sell
them under the authority or with consent of the owner, the buyer acquires no better title
than the seller had……..”
- This rule is best illustrated by the decision in Cundy V. Lindsay and Company Ltd. Where a
person who had acquired goods fraudulently purported to sell them to appellant. It was held
that the apparent had no title in the goods as the fraudulent person had non to pass to him.
raphael answered the question on April 16, 2018 at 17:23


Next: Explain the importance of the feast of Pentecost to the Jews
Previous: Discuss the main exceptions to the rule “Nemo dat quod non habet”.

View More CPA Commercial Law Questions and Answers | Return to Questions Index


Learn High School English on YouTube

Related Questions