Get premium membership and access questions with answers, video lessons as well as revision papers.

Citing decided cases, explain the doctrine of “Ultra vires.”

      

Citing decided cases, explain the doctrine of “Ultra vires.”

  

Answers


Maurice
Ultra Vires literally means beyond the powers.
This is a rule of capacity of registered companies contained in the provisions of the
Companies Act.

This rule is to the effect that a registered company can only enter into transactions
provided for by the objects clause and those that are reasonably incidental to the
attainment of such objects. Other transactions are beyond the powers and therefore
unenforceable.

The doctrin of ultra vires was first incorporated into the Companies Act in 1844, but it
was not until 1875 that it was accorded a judicial interpretation in Ashbury
RailwayCarriage and Iron Co. V. Riche where the court was emphatic that the capacity
of a registered company was restricted to transactions expressly stipulated in the objects
clause. Other transactions were Ultra vires.

However, in Attorney General V. Great Eastern Railway Co. Ltd, it was held that in
addition to the express objects, a company had capacity to engage in transaction
reasonably incidental to the attainment or pursuit of such objects.
This decision expanded the contractual capacity of companies and weakened the
doctrine of ultra vires.

An Ultra Vires transaction remains Ultra vires and nothing can be done to render it
Intra vires. It was so held in the Rolled steel case as well as in Brady V. Brady.

An ultra vires transaction cannot be rendered intra vires by estoppel, lapse of time, delay
acquiescence or ratification.

The doctrine of ultra vires in company law has been weakened so much so that
companies enjoy almost unrestricted capacity.

One of the most common approaches to giving companies unrestricted capacity is the
use of subjective clauses in the objects clause, for example “the company can engage in
such other trade or business which can in the option of the board of directors be carried
on advantageously for the company as was the case in Bell Houses Ltd V. City
wallproperties Ltd.
maurice.mutuku answered the question on April 27, 2018 at 08:01


Next: Distinguish between Incorporated and unincorporated associations.
Previous: (a) Eleza maana ya mivigo na inakotumika (b) Eleza sifa za miviga (c) Onyesha umuhimu wa miviga.

View More CPA Commercial Law Questions and Answers | Return to Questions Index


Learn High School English on YouTube

Related Questions