Mrs. Karanja and Mrs. Waithaka are neighbours. Their sons, Mwaura Karanja and Mwangi Waithaka, had a fight and Mwangi was hurt. In annoyance, Mrs. Waithaka hurled a...

      

Mrs. Karanja and Mrs. Waithaka are neighbours. Their sons, Mwaura Karanja and
Mwangi Waithaka, had a fight and Mwangi was hurt.
In annoyance, Mrs. Waithaka hurled a stone at Mrs. Karanja but the stone did not hit
Mrs. Karanja. Mrs. Waithaka rushed to her house and came out with a bucket of water
which she splashed on Mrs. Karanja making her clothes wet. Mrs. Karanja intends to
sue Mrs. Waithaka.

Advise Mrs. Karanja on the kinds of tort that she may seek redress from.

  

Answers


Maurice
This problem is based on the law of torts. In this case Mrs. Waithaka hurled a stone at Mrs.
Karanja but missed but subsequently succeeded in splashing Mrs. Karanja with water
making her clothes wet. Mrs. Karanja is aggrieved by the acts of Mrs. Waithaka and has a
number of causes of action for which she can seek judicial redress. Firstly the hurling of the
stone by Mrs. Waithaka to Mrs. Karanja amounts to assault as is created apprehension of
some contact with her person. Secondly, the splashing of Mrs. Karanja with water amounted
to battery as there was a physical contact with her person.

It therefore follows that Mrs. Karanja can sue Mrs. Waithaka in damages for assault and
battery.

These torts are actionable per se and Mrs. Karanja does not have to prove any loss for Mrs.
Waithaka to be held liable.

My advice to Mrs. Karanja is based on the general law of torts.
maurice.mutuku answered the question on April 28, 2018 at 06:22


Next: Explain defences which may be offered by a defendant to an action for trespass to the person.
Previous: In relation to the Sale of Goods Act, Explain four circumstances when a seller may give a better title to the buyer than he himself has...

View More CPA Commercial Law Questions and Answers | Return to Questions Index


Exams With Marking Schemes

Related Questions