Get premium membership and access questions with answers, video lessons as well as revision papers.

Explain the principle in the rule in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Vs. Selfridge & Co. Ltd, (1915)and the exceptions thereof.

      

Explain the principle in the rule in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Vs. Selfridge & Co. Ltd,
(1915)and the exceptions thereof.

  

Answers


Maurice
The principle enunciated or applied in this case is the fundamental rule of privity of
contract which is to the effect that:
(i) Only a person who is party to a contract can sue or be sued on it.

(ii) Only a person who has provided consideration is privy to a contract.

(iii) A stranger to consideration cannot sue or be sued on the contract even if it was
intended to benefit him.

The common law doctrine of privity of contract has several exceptions for example:
(a) Agency: A principal may sue or be sued on a contract entered into by the agent.
This exception is more apparent than real in that in law, the agent represents the principal who is therefore party to the contract.

(b) Negotiable Instruments: a holder of a negotiable instrument can sue on it in his
own name even though he has not provided consideration. This exception is contained in section 27 (1) of the Bills of Exchange Act.

(c) Third Party Insurance: under the provisions of the Insurance (Motor vehicles
ThirdParty Risks) Act Cap 45, a victim of a motor accident is entitled to compensation
by the insurer for any injuries sustained. The insurer is liable as long as the motor
vehicle was in the hands of the insured or an authorized driver.

(d) Legal assignment: if a creditor assigns his debt to a third party e.g. pursuant to
theprovisions of the Indian Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the assignee is entitled to
sue the debtor as if he were the original creditor.

(e) Trust:: the beneficiary is in certain circumstances permitted to sue the
trustee notwithstanding the absence of privity between the two.

(f) Contracts or Covenants running with land: certain benefits and liabilities attached
toor imposed on land are in certain circumstances enjoyed by subsequent holders of the
land upon whom liability may also attach.
maurice.mutuku answered the question on April 28, 2018 at 09:10


Next: Differentiate between Law of succession and law of trust.
Previous: Mr. Jumbe who was vying for the national chairmanship of a political party, engaged Mr. Musika, a local musician to perform in a series of campaign...

View More CPA Commercial Law Questions and Answers | Return to Questions Index


Learn High School English on YouTube

Related Questions