Get premium membership and access questions with answers, video lessons as well as revision papers.

a)State the circumstances under which a company would be required to maintain an index of the register of members b) Kazi Bure borrowed...

      

a)State the circumstances under which a company would be required to maintain an index
of the register of members

b) Kazi Bure borrowed Shs.50,000 from Tumaini Bank and deposited his XYZ Supermarket Ltd‟s share certificate with a blank transfer as a security. Subsequently he bought goods from the supermarket on credit. The goods were worth Shs.15,000. The articles of association of XYZ Supermarket Ltd claimed a first and paramount lien on its members shares on debts due to the supermarket. However, before the supermarket lien arose the bank gave the supermarket notice of Kazi Bure's share certificate having been lodged with the bank as a security for the loan. Kazi Bure is unable to pay for the goods he obtained from the supermarket and has also defaulted on the loan. XYZ Supermarket Ltd wants to exercise its lien and the bank wants to exercise its equitable right to have the shares transferred to into its name.

In this situation discuss the rights of

i) The Bank
ii) XYZ Supermarket Ltd

c) Bob and Babs jointly own shares in Powerfoam Ltd. They are seeking your advice
regarding their legal position as joint holders of the shares. Advice them

  

Answers


Martin
a) Under the provisions of the Companies Act every company with more than fifty members must have an index of the names of the members unless the register is in the form of an index.
-It may be in the form of a card.
- The index must contain a sufficient indication to facilitate access to a members account.
- Changes on the register must be incorporated in the indeed within 14 days.
-The index must be kept at the same place as the register of members.

b)
i) Bank
-In law if a third party advances money on the security of shares and the third party gives notice of his security to the company before the company's lien arises the third party will have priority
In Bradford Banking Co. v Briggs and Co. (1886) a shareholder created an equitable mortgage of his shares by depositing the share certificate with a blank as security for an overdraft and the bank gave notice of the notice of the deposit to the company. The shareholder subsequently became indebted to the company whereupon a lien arose in favour of the company t was held that the bank had priority as the company?s lien arose after notice of the equitable mortgage.
- The bank is entitled to enforce the lien on the shares since its lien has priority over that of the company. This position is consistent with the holding in Bradford Banking Co. v Briggs and Co. (1886)


ii) XYZ Supermarket Ltd XYZ Supermarket Ltd cannot enforce its lien since the banks lien has priority.

c) Bob and Babs have similar rights in relation to the shares e.g. dividend payable thereon. They are jointly and severally liable to make good any calls on the shares. In the case of voting in general meetings the members decide who among them is to vote, failing which the member whose name appears on the register first votes.
marto answered the question on February 6, 2019 at 08:52


Next: The capital of may no doubt be diminished by the expenditure upon and reasonably incidental to all the objects specified. A part of it may...
Previous: Outline the various matters that require to be sanctioned by members through a special resolution.

View More CPA Company Law Questions and Answers | Return to Questions Index


Learn High School English on YouTube

Related Questions