(a) The principle of corporate legal personality is an important and fundamental aspect of company law. Discuss this statement citing relevant decided cases....

      


(a) The principle of corporate legal personality is an important and fundamental aspect of company law.

Discuss this statement citing relevant decided cases.

(b) Ropoff Company Ltd., a private limited company, has been under inquiry on alleged fraudulent financial transactions. The officers of the company under suspicion have denied any association with the company.

At the inquiry it was suggested that the corporate veil be lifted and the realities of the company in question be looked into.

Explain the instances when the veil of incorporation may be l

  

Answers


Martin
(b)
In the words of Lord MacNaghten in Salomon V. Salomon and Co. Ltd.(1897). 'The company's at law a different person altogether from the subscribers to the memorandum'
This is the ratio decided in Salomon's case and constitutes one of the fundamental principles of company law.
In simple legal parlance the principle of legal personality of the company is to the effect that when a company is incorporated it becomes a legal person, distinct and separate from its members and managers. It becomes a body corporate or a juristic person. It acquires an independent legal existence with rights and subject to duties with certain capacities and subject to in capacities.
The principle of corporate legal personality is now exemplified by the words that 'From the date of incorporation mentioned in the certificate of incorporation, the subscribers to the memorandum together with such other persons as may from time to time become members of the company shall be a body corporate'
The most fundamental attribute of incorporation from which all other consequences flow is that on incorporation a company becomes a body corporate – a different legal entity. This principle manifests itself through the principle of:
i) Limited liability: Sec 4 (2) (a) and (b) of the Companies Act.
ii) Perpetual succession: Sec 16(2) of the companies Act.
iii) Sue or be sued: Foss V. Harbottle (1843)
iv) Owning of property: section 16(2) of the ActMacaura V. Northern Assurance Co.(1925)
v) Capacity to contract: Lee V. Lee's Air Farming Co. Ltd(1961)
vi) Common Seal: section 16 (2) of the Act.

A critical analysis of the Judicial and statutory authority demonstrates that the principle of corporate legal personality is incontrovertibly an important and fundamental aspect of company law.

This problem is based on the concept of piercing the corporate shell or simply put lifting the veil of incorporation or modifying the rule in Salomon's case. Both parliament and courts of law have recognized circumstances in which the veil of incorporation may be lifted and regard had to the individual members of the company and its subsidiaries are treated as one of regard it had to the economic realities of the group. These circumstances are exceptions to the rule in Salomon's case.

- Legislative or parliamentary or statutory exceptions
- Reduction in number of members: section 33 of the Companies Act.
-Non-publication or mis description of the Companies name: section 109 (4) of the Act. Group accounts: section 150-152 of the Companies Act.
- Investigation of companies affairs: section 167 of the Act.
- Investigation of company membership: section 173 of the Act.
-Fraudulent trading: section 323 (1) (a) of the Act. - Common law or judicial exceptions
- Agency trustee or nominee:
-Inre F. G. Films Ltd.
-Smith Stone and Knight V. Birmingham Corporation
- Firestone Tyre and Rubber Co V. Llewellin
-Group enterprises: Harold Holdsworth and Co V. Caddies
marto answered the question on February 7, 2019 at 06:10


Next: Argue for and against international trade restrictions.
Previous: 'The rule in the case of Ashbury Railway Carriage Vs. Riche (1875)stated that an act has not been authorized by the objects clause of a...

View More CPA Company Law Questions and Answers | Return to Questions Index


Exams With Marking Schemes

Related Questions